Mesorat%20hashas for Shevuot 38:12

<br><br><big><strong>הדרן עלך ידועות הטומאה</strong></big><br><br>

and between Resh Lakish's statements.]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For Resh Lakish said above that the Tanna who says he is liable (in the ease of entering the Temple after walking along two paths etc.) agrees with R. Ishmael that there is no need for knowledge at the beginning; Resh Lakish could have said that he agrees with Rabbi (according to Resh Lakish's exposition of his view) that doubtful knowledge is counted as definite knowledge.');">¹⁶</span> - Granted that there is no contradiction between one statement of R'Johanan and the other statement of R'Johanan, [for he said:] 'Here they made [doubtful knowledge like definite knowledge]', and not everywhere in the whole Torah did they do so; for [only] here, because knowledge [at the beginning] is not explicitly written, but is deduced from and it be hidden,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. V, 3; v. supra 4a.');">¹⁷</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Shevuot 38:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.